Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench Verdict:
Stay on RTE Admission Rule
Recently, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court
stayed a rule issued by the Government of Maharashtra. This rule, framed under
the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, restricted
admissions to private schools to a radius of just one kilometer from the
child's place of residence. This judicial decision is being hailed as a
significant step towards safeguarding children's right to education.
More on the News
¨
The Nagpur Bench of the
Bombay High Court stayed two clauses of the Government Resolution issued by the
Maharashtra government on 12 February 2026.
¨
The court observed that
the restriction appeared to be contrary to provisions of the RTE Act and could
violate constitutional guarantees under Articles 14, 21 and 21A.
¨
The bench directed the
authorities to modify the online admission system so that applications can be
submitted according to the provisions of the RTE Act and earlier court rulings.
¨
The RTE admission process
in Maharashtra began on 17 February 2026 and the last date for submitting
applications for the regular selection list was 10 March 2026.
¨
The interim stay is
expected to delay the admission process while the authorities revise the system
in compliance with the court’s order.
Understanding the Background of the Issue
¨
In 2024, the Bombay High
Court struck down a Maharashtra government rule that exempted private schools
from providing RTE admissions if a government school existed within a
one-kilometre radius.
¨
On 12 February 2026 the
Maharashtra government issued a new Government Resolution that introduced a one
kilometre radius restriction for applications under the RTE quota.
¨
Parents could only select
and apply to private unaided schools located within 1 kilometre of their
registered residence. This was a sharp decrease from previous years, where
parents could apply to schools within a 3-kilometre radius or beyond.
¨
A petition challenging
the restriction was filed by a Scheduled Tribe parent from Chandrapur district
who stated that no private school existed within one kilometre of his
residence.
¨
The petitioner argued
that the restriction prevented him from applying for admission for his child
under the RTE quota.
¨
The court stayed the rule
and directed authorities to ensure that admissions are conducted in accordance
with the provisions of the RTE Act.
RTE Quota
¨
Section 12(1)(c) of the
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act mandates that private
unaided schools reserve 25% of entry level seats for children from economically
weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.
¨
Disadvantaged Groups (DG)
includes children from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other
Backward Classes (OBC-non creamy layer), etc.
¨
The provision seeks to
promote social inclusion and equitable access to quality education.
¨
The quota generally
applies to entry-level classes such as nursery, kindergarten or Class 1,
depending on the structure of the school.
¨
The state government
reimburses private schools for the cost incurred in educating students admitted
under this quota.
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory
Education Act 2009
¨
The RTE Act came into
force in 2009 to implement the fundamental right to education guaranteed under
Article 21A of the Constitution of India.
¨
The Act guarantees free
and compulsory education to all children between six and fourteen years of age.
¨
It lays down minimum
standards for school infrastructure, teacher qualifications and student
learning conditions.
¨
The Act prohibits
physical punishment, mental harassment and discrimination against students.
¨
The Act aims to ensure
universal elementary education and reduce educational inequality across social
groups in India.
¨
The Act initially
introduced a no detention policy up to Class 8 which was later modified through
RTE Amendment Act 2019, allowing states to conduct examinations.
Constitutional Provisions Related to
Education
¨ Article 21A guarantees
the fundamental right to free and compulsory education for children between six
and fourteen years of age.
¨
Article 45 directs the
state to provide early childhood care and education for children below six
years of age.
¨ Article 51A(k) places a
fundamental duty on parents and guardians to provide opportunities for
education to children between six and fourteen years of age.