BCCI cannot be treated as a “Public Authority” under the RTI Act: Central Information Commission

¨     Central Information Commission (CIC) ruled on 18 May 2026 that the Board of Control for Cricket in India is not a “public authority” under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.

¨     The decision was delivered by Information Commissioner P. R. Ramesh while hearing an appeal.

¨     The appeal raised questions regarding BCCI’s role in Indian team selection and representing India in international cricket tournaments.

¨     The Right to Information Act, 2005 aims to ensure transparency and accountability in public institutions.

¨     The RTI Act applies only to bodies classified as “public authorities.”

¨     Under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, a public authority is an institution established by the Constitution, Parliament, state legislature, or a government notification.

¨     Institutions owned, controlled, or substantially financed by the government may also fall within the scope of the RTI Act.

¨     The CIC stated that the Board of Control for Cricket in India is a private autonomous body registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act.

¨   According to the Commission, BCCI was not established through the Constitution, Parliament, state legislature, or government notification.

¨   The Commission further clarified that BCCI is neither owned nor controlled nor substantially funded by the government.

¨     Therefore, BCCI cannot be treated as a “public authority” under the RTI Act.