Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment
Bill, 2026
The Lok Sabha has passed the Supreme Court (Number of
Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, increasing the sanctioned strength of judges in
the Supreme Court of India from 34 to 38, including the Chief Justice of India
(CJI). The amendment aims to strengthen the judicial system by addressing the
growing workload and reducing the pendency of cases. The Bill replaces the
ordinance promulgated in May 2026.
The Supreme Court of India was established on 28
January 1950. Under Article 124 of the Constitution, Parliament has the authority
to determine and increase the number of Supreme Court judges through
legislation. Initially, the Court consisted of one Chief Justice and seven
puisne judges, but the sanctioned strength has been increased several times
over the years to meet rising judicial demands.
More on the News
¨
The Bill replaces the
Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Ordinance, 2026, promulgated by the
President in May 2026, after the Union Cabinet approved the proposal on 5 May
2026.
¨
It amends the Supreme
Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 by increasing the number of judges from 33
to 37 (excluding the Chief Justice of India), thereby raising the total
sanctioned strength to 38 judges.
¨
The Government stated
that the increase in judicial strength is aimed at addressing the growing
backlog of cases, improving docket management, and enabling faster disposal of
matters, particularly Constitution Bench cases.
Constitutional and Legal Framework
¨
Article 124 of the
Constitution establishes the Supreme Court of India.
¨
Article 124(1) provides
that the Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice of India and such
number of other judges as Parliament may prescribe by law.
¨
Therefore, no
Constitutional Amendment is required to alter the strength of Supreme Court
judges; Parliament can do so through an ordinary law passed by a simple
majority.
¨
Parliament enacted the
Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 to prescribe the maximum sanctioned
strength of the Supreme Court.
¨
The Supreme Court (Number
of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026 amends Section 2 of the Act by substituting
“33″ with “37“, thereby increasing the number of judges excluding the Chief
Justice of India.
Rationale Behind the Increase
¨
Rising Pendency of Cases:
92,101 cases were pending before the Supreme Court. The Court has experienced a
persistent gap between the institution of new cases and their disposal.
¨
Growing Litigation:
During 2025, the Supreme Court received 75,410 fresh cases but disposed of only
65,615 cases, resulting in a continued increase in pending matters.
¨
Improving Docket
Management: A larger judicial strength is expected to improve the Court’s
ability to manage its growing docket, particularly long-pending matters.
¨
Constitution Bench
Requirements: Many constitutional and nationally significant cases require
Benches of five or more judges. Increasing the number of judges would
facilitate the constitution of more Constitution Benches without affecting
regular judicial work.
¨
Strengthening Judicial
Capacity: The Government considers increasing the sanctioned strength as one of
the most immediate and practical measures to enhance judicial efficiency and
ensure timely justice.
Significance / Implications of the Move
¨
Reduction in Case
Backlog: Additional judges are expected to accelerate the disposal of pending
cases and reduce delays in the justice delivery system.
¨
Timely Access to Justice:
Faster adjudication will strengthen citizens’ access to speedy justice, an
essential component of the rule of law.
¨
More Effective
Constitution Benches: The enhanced strength will enable the Supreme Court to
constitute more Constitution Benches while maintaining the disposal of routine
cases.
¨
Improved Judicial
Efficiency: Greater judicial capacity is likely to improve overall docket
management and reduce the gap between new filings and case disposal.
¨
Strengthening the Justice
Delivery System: The amendment reinforces institutional capacity without
requiring constitutional changes and supports a more responsive and efficient
judiciary.