Supreme Court of India has imposed an interim ban on construction and development within 100 metres of the edge of the Jojari River in Rajasthan

¨     Supreme Court of India has imposed an interim ban on construction and development within 100 metres of the edge of the Jojari River in Rajasthan.

¨     Hazardous industries and pollution-causing activities have also been prohibited within 500 metres on either side of the river’s existing flood line or present flow path.

¨     The case is a suo motu environmental matter titled “In Re: 2 Million Lives At Risk, Contamination In Jojari River, Rajasthan.”

¨     The case concerns industrial pollution in western Rajasthan affecting areas linked to Jodhpur, Pali and Balotra.

¨     The restrictions will remain in force until the scientific demarcation of the High Flood Line and ecological buffer zones is completed.

¨     The Court emphasized the need for scientific identification of flood-prone and environmentally sensitive areas along the river.

¨     The Supreme Court directed the Rajasthan government to constitute an Integrated Coordination Group.

¨     The group will be headed by the Chief Secretary and will address pollution in the Jojari, Bandi and Luni rivers.

¨     The state government has also been directed to establish an independent River Commission or River Rejuvenation Authority for the restoration of polluted river systems.

¨     The Court clarified that the Integrated Coordination Group is an internal government arrangement and does not override the High-Level Ecosystem Oversight Committee.

¨     Suo motu means that a court initiates proceedings on its own motion without a formal petition from a party.

¨     The High Flood Line indicates the level or boundary up to which floodwaters may rise in a particular area.

¨     River rejuvenation authorities are intended to support pollution control, ecological restoration and basin-level coordination.

¨     The Jojari, Bandi and Luni rivers are important components of the river systems of western Rajasthan.

¨     The case is important from the perspective of environmental protection, floodplain regulation, river pollution control and judicial intervention in environmental matters.